 |
|
|
| Velocities
of the same body in two frames of reference (see text).
|
|
|
Everyday
experience indicates that in a given field of gravity, such as the
field caused by the Earth, the greater the mass of a body the greater
the force acting on it. That is to say, the more massive a body
the more effectively will it tend to fall toward the Earth; in fact,
in order to determine the mass of a body one weighs it--that is
to say, one really measures the force by which it is attracted to
the Earth, whereas the mass is properly defined as the body's resistance
to acceleration. Newton noted that the ratio of the attractive force
to a body's mass in a given field is the same for all bodies, irrespective
of their chemical constitution and other characteristics, and that
they all undergo the same acceleration in free fall; this common
rate of acceleration on the surface of the Earth amounts to an increase
in speed by approximately 32 feet (about 9.8 metres) per second
every second.
This
common rate of gravitationally caused acceleration is illustrated
dramatically in space travel during periods of coasting. The vehicle,
the astronauts, and all other objects within the space capsule undergo
the same acceleration, hence no acceleration relative to each other.
The result is apparent weightlessness: no force holds the astronaut
to the floor of his cabin or a liquid in an
open container. To this extent, the behaviour of objects within
the freely coasting space capsule is indistinguishable from the
condition that would be encountered if the space capsule were outside
all gravitational fields in interstellar space and moved in accordance
with the law of inertia. Conversely, if a space capsule were to
be accelerated upward by its rocket engines in the absence of gravitation,
all objects inside would behave exactly as if the capsule were at
rest but in a gravitational field. The principle of equivalence
states formally the equivalence, in terms of local experiments,
of gravitational forces and reactions to an accelerated noninertial
frame of reference (e.g., the capsule while the rockets are
being fired) and the equivalence between inertial frames of reference
and local freely falling frames of reference. Of course, the principle
of equivalence refers strictly to local effects: looking out of
his window and performing navigational observations, the astronaut
can tell how he is moving relative to the planets and moons of the
solar system.
Einstein
argued, however, that in the presence of gravitational fields there
is no unambiguous way to separate gravitational pull from the effects
occasioned by the noninertial character of one's chosen frame of
reference; hence one cannot identify an inertial frame of reference
with complete precision. Thus the principle of equivalence renders
the gravitational field fundamentally different from all other force
fields encountered in nature. The new theory of gravitation, the
general theory of relativity, adopts this characteristic of the
gravitational field as its foundation.
Curved
space-time
In
terms of Minkowski's space-time, inertial frames of reference are
the analogues of rectilinear (straight-line) Cartesian coordinate
systems in Euclidean geometry. In a plane these coordinate systems
always exist, but they do not exist on the surface of a sphere:
any attempt to cover a spherical surface with a grid of squares
breaks down when the grid is extended over a significant fraction
of the spherical surface. Thus a plane is a flat surface, whereas
the surface of a sphere is curved. This distinction, based entirely
on internal properties of the surface itself, classifies the surface
of a cylinder as flat, as it can be rolled off on a plane and thus
is capable of being covered by a grid of squares.
Einstein
conjectured that the presence of a gravitational field causes space-time
to be curved (whereas in the absence of gravitation it is flat),
and that this is the reason that inertial frames cannot be constructed.
The curved trajectory of a particle in space and time resulting
from the effects of gravitation would then represent not a straight
line (which exists only in flat spaces and space-times) but the
straightest curve possible in a curved space-time, a geodesic. Geodesics
on a sphere (such as the surface of the Earth) are the great circles.
(The plane of any great circle goes through the centre of the Earth.)
They are the least curved lines one can construct on the surface
of a sphere, and they are the shortest curves connecting any two
points. The geodesics of space-time connect two events (or two instants
in the history of one particle) with the greatest lapse of proper
time, as was indicated in the earlier discussion of the twin paradox.
If
the presence of a gravitational field amounts to a curvature of
space-time, then the description of the gravitational field in turn
hinges on a mathematical elucidation of the curvature of four-dimensional
space-time. Before Einstein, the German mathematician Bernhard Riemann
(1826-66) had developed methods related directly to the failure
of any attempt to construct square grids. If one were to construct
within any small piece of (two-dimensional) surface a quadrilateral
whose sides are geodesics, if the surface were flat, the sum of
the angles at the four corners would be 360º. If the surface
is not flat, the sum of the angles will not be 360º. The deviation
of the actual sum of the angles from 360º will be proportional
to the area of the quadrilateral; the amount of deviation per unit
of surface will be a measure of the curvature of that surface. If
the surface is imbedded in a higher dimensional continuum, then
one can consider similarly unavoidable angles between vectors constructed
as parallel as possible to each other at the four corners of the
quadrilateral, and thus associate several distinct components of
curvature with one surface. And, of course, there are several independent
possible orientations of two-dimensional surfaces--for instance,
six in a four-dimensional continuum, such as space-time. Altogether
there are 20 distinct and independent components of curvature defined
at each point of space-time; in mathematics these are referred to
as the 20 components of Riemann's curvature tensor.
<<
Previous | Next
>>
Contents:
Introduction
The
special theory of relativity
Historical
background
Relativity
of space and time
Consequences
The
limiting character of the speed of light
Variable
mass
Invariant
intervals
The
"twin paradox"
Four-dimensional
space-time
The
general theory of relativity
Physical
origins
The
principle of equivalence
Curved
space-time
The
principles
The
mathematical expression
Confirmation
of the theory
Advance
of Mercury's perihelion
Gravitational
redshift
Optical
effects of gravitation
Gravitational
waves
Future
astrophysical tests
Conceptual
implications of general relativity
Schwarzschild's
solution of the field equations
Applications
of relativistic principles
Particle
accelerators
Relativistic
particle physics
Relativistic
cosmology
Modifications
of general relativity
Bibliography
|
|